Cats are Eeeeeeeevil !!!

Jim Downey's picture

(Seems I've been pwned, according to sko's comment below. Ah well.)

So, it seems that cats are the perfect companion for us atheists. From a Jehovah's Witness site, under the title "Are cats for true christians?":

First, let us consider what most scholars agree is the etymology (word derivation) for the English term 'cat'. When analyzed with the Latin 'felis cattus domesticus', the original Koine Greek is 'cur.io huma bes-tia', means 'a contemporary housecat with all of its beastly identifying characteristics and behavior.' A faithful servant of Jehovah would quickly notice that the nature of a cat is so marked as being 'beastly'. The Bible makes clear reference to this condition when describing parts of Satan's organizations, both past and present. For instance, consider the fearsome 'beasts' as described in the book of Daniel or the 'scarlet colored wild beast' in Rev. 17:3. ...

Clearly, the Bible - by using this kind of terminology - shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the basic nature of cats, while created perfect by God, has become evil or 'beastlike' since the fall of Adam six thousand years ago, and more probably, since the Great Flood of Noah's time (c2350 B.C.E.). This is a development of the condition borne by the 'Original Serpent', the 'Great Dragon' Lucifer himself. (Gen. 3:1) Indeed, modern studies of classification of cats, while not necessarily being reliable as they may be based on the discredited 'theory' of evolution, strongly associate felines with serpents (despite some external differences in physiology and morphology, which confuse those who do not study these matters deeply).

Well, that seems rather straight-forward enough. Cats are Eeeeeeevil. But, just to be sure, let's look at another passage:

The Bible does not say that cats were not present at Herod's birthday party when John the Baptist was beheaded. History shows that cats were most likely present at this tragic party that Jehovah did not approve of. Clearly then, as loyal Christians, why would we even want to associate with animals that are without a doubt of such bad influence, remembering how true are the Bible's words: 'Bad associations spoil useful habits'! -1 Cor. 15:33. Some have exposed themselves to possible spiritual contamination in this way. To invite cats in our house is to toy with disaster. Can one deny that the chance exists that the same grave consequences could visit your home that fell upon John?

You mean, I could have my head cut off because I had something in my home which the Bible did not say was not present at Herod's birthday party? Whoa...that would imply that we could only have things in our homes which the Bible specifically mentions at being present there. Huh. Gotta love reasoning like that.

OK, the website goes on with more ridiculous such comments, funny enough until it takes a rather nasty turn on the subject of what a "good Christian" should do with an unwanted cat. It starts out saying that you should just give it to one of us Wicked People. But then this:

If, on the other hand, one took the view stated on page 128 of the abovementioned Watchtower, and consider that the pet or any other animal is under the ultimate jurisdiction of a Christian, who therefore bears responsibilities (Eccl. 12:13,14; Jas. 4:17, 1 Pet. 3:21) that are essentially parental in nature. The cat is a dependant. In harmony with this, surely it is the parent's obligation before God to ensure the feline pet is treated as one would an unruly child who repeatedly refused to obey its parents, or of one who committed apostasy. Unfortunately in the case of human offspring, one is limited by the laws of the higher authorities of the land as to what scripturally-ordained punishment may be meted out, as compliance with both sets of laws is necessary in such areas. This may not always be the case in terms of felines, where the fact that we are not living in theocratic countries may not prove such an impediment to what God requires of us, as manmade law may not afford such unmerited protection to cats as it does to humans.

Emphasis in the above quote mine. Yeah, they cite the business in the Bible about putting an unruly child to death. Which they lament not being able to do.

Maybe it's not the cats which are evil.

Jim Downey

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous User's picture

OVER 450 JEHOVAH'S WITNESS LAWSUITS, COURT CASES, ETC. SUMMARIZE

OVER 450 JEHOVAH'S WITNESS LAWSUITS, COURT CASES, ETC. SUMMARIZED

This website summarizes 300 United States court cases and lawsuits affecting children of Jehovah's Witnesses, including dozens of cases where the Parents refused to consent to life-saving blood transfusions:

DIVORCE, BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING CHILDREN OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com/

This website summarizes 160 United States court cases and lawsuits filed by Jehovah's Witnesses against Employers:

EMPLOYMENT ISSUES UNIQUE TO JEHOVAH'S WITNESS EMPLOYEES

http://jwemployees.bravehost.com

EdK's picture

Inspirational Parody

I guess this is the danger of generating a too-subtle parody, one could start a "Church of the Whatever" following. Talk about unintended consequences!

sko's picture

It's a parody

The text is a spoof of some real JW texts, but its a parody one the less.

I know the guy running the website, he says he stole the text of the internet for some time ago, and it was always meant as a joke ;)

/Soren

Jim Downey's picture

Duped!

Parody, eh? Well, then I've been duped - tell your buddy that he tricked another one!

I read so much insane crap on religious websites/by religious people that I suppose I've lost the ability to sniff out parody...

Jim Downey

"Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering."
- R. Buckminster Fuller

sko's picture

Proof - or at least a link

Just to back up my statement.

The guy behind the site, Carlo, is active on an atheist forum, run by Atheistic Forum where I'm on the board.

The Cat story has been up on Pharyngula for some time ago, and even before that Carlo brought the story on our forum. He knows quite a lot about the inner workings of the JW organization, and he works hard to oppose them.

The first post on our forum where he mentions the cat story can be found here: http://debat.ateist.net/showpost.php?p=3961

Here he also tells about how the JW's layers have made him remove some material from the site, because it was copyrighted by the Watchtower organization.

Its all in Danish, so you still have to take my word for it though ;)

/Soren

Jim Downey's picture

Nah, that's cool.

No sweat, Soren. I thought about just deleting the diary, but I don't mind proof that I too can be duped. It's good for us all to keep our critical thinking skills sharp.

Jim Downey

"Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering."
- R. Buckminster Fuller

Cat's picture

this again?

Jeez, I thought they got this out of their system centuries ago. Some people just can't stand to be around a superior species. Unfortuanetly the last time this occured there was a lot of stariotyping of single women cat-owners as being witches (and we all know how that turned out).

On another note, does this means beasts of burden are also evil and should be exterminated? Sigh, and Christians say we're immoral, yet their own people, if not limited by the laws of the land, would kill unwanted children (also known as post-term abortion to those trying to insinuate that abortion kills children).

Aerik's picture

And this leads to...

And since there's also a sexist trend by anti-choicers to stereotype American single women (in reaction to the study that showed most American women are now un-married) as cat-lovers by default, I can see this as becoming a fierce misogynist tirade as soon as those worlds collide.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content