Atheist Rights

Hank Fox's picture

I’ve been toying with the following “Atheist Declaration of Rights.” I’d welcome any additions, deletions, changes or corrections. And if someone else has already done this, I’d appreciate knowing that too.

Atheist Declaration of Rights

1. Freedom from Fear and Hate:
In every part of America, atheists have the right to live free of fear for their personal safety, their homes, pets and possessions. Atheists have the right to be safe from public hate speech and vilification.

2. Freedom of Speech:
Atheists have the right to freely speak of atheism in public, or to publicly display characteristic messages or symbols, without fear of repercussion, in the same degree that religious speakers enjoy.

3. Equal Time:
Atheists have the right to equal time with religious voices on any public issue. They have the right to equal and open airing of their convictions, views and concerns, and to participate in any public discussion of morality, ethics or social issues, to the exact degree that religious voices are invited to speak. Atheists have the right to equal time to respond, on any stage or medium, anytime atheists or atheism is covered in a negative light. Atheists have the right to equal access to media in order to weigh in on science, medicine, social policy, political campaigns, etc., and to receive respect equal to that given religious voices.

4. Equal Rights:
Atheists have equal rights in the work environment, in voting, in running for public office, in serving on juries or any other public or social/civic duty. Atheists have the right to be free from religious discrimination in the seeking of housing or jobs.

Atheists have the right to join any civic or educational organization that people of religion can join, without discrimination.

Atheist organizations have the right to public resources, information or publicity on an equal basis with religious groups. Atheist organizations aimed at good works have a right to the same sort of tax advantages that religious organizations have.

Atheists have the right to decline to take part in religious ceremonies, and to refuse religious oaths, without fear of reprisal or disenfranchisement. Atheist soldiers have the right to claim conscientious objector status on an equal footing with those of any religious persuasion.

5. Equal Representation:
Atheists have the right as taxpayers to know that tax money intended for public works and charities is not diverted to bolster the coffers or support the sectarian message of any church or religious group. Atheists have the right to government free of religious influence, schools free of religious coercion, and courthouses free of religious oaths.

6. Religious Freedom:
Atheists, like all citizens, have the right to be free of religious proselytizing in captive public environments such as schools, courthouses, and public sporting events.

All people, including minor teens, have the right to express religious preferences – including atheism – different from any historic religious tradition without fear of reprisal from family, social or political group, tribe, church, or government.

7. Family Integrity:
Atheist parents have the right to expect that their children will be safe from harassment and prejudice when away from home. They have the right to expect that their children will not be singled out for ridicule or aggressive religious proselytizing.

Atheists and their children have the right to freedom from religious proselytizing, baptizing, involuntary conversion practices or invasive medical procedures in any venue such as hospitals, emergency medical or senior care facilities.

Atheists have the right to NOT have their words or deeds rewritten after their deaths through stories of deathbed conversions.

8. Scientific Integrity:
Atheists, like all citizens, have the right to expect that publicly-funded scientific research is carried out by scientific principles rather than religious ones, and that medical research and decisions should be informed by science and reason rather than religion.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous User's picture

Atheist Rights Basis?

In the American tradition, one has rights because they are god-given, and, therefore, inalienable. Upon what basis does an atheist have any rights at all?

Hank Fox's picture

Atheist rights?

Why ... none.

If atheists take over, if God disappears from our lives, we'll have no rights at all!

Oh, SWEET JESUS!! I guess we'll all be, like, slaves and stuff!! Oh, God, save us from such a fate!

Oh, Anonymous User, you have uncovered the flaw in the Atheist Conspiracy!

...

Now we can all go back to being good Christians, and the takeover of America can proceed on schedule.

Jim Downey's picture

Heh.

Hehehehehehehehehe!

Jim Downey

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.

John M's picture

Right to Respect and to be Respected

I claim the word "Respect" in the name of atheism. It is ours. It is what we live by.

My rant: "Morality" is a confliplastifrikinaberration of a word, worthy only of the confusing comparison to my own made-up word. Why should we have to continue to defend our views using this indefinitive mind-clotting word.
I respect my neighbor: Which means I will not steal his belongings, his life, or his wife.
I respect my wife: Which means that she is my partner in all things. I will not lie to her or cheat on her because I vowed to marry and be faithful to her.
I respect my children: Which means I will support their growth and avoid controlling them with superstitious lies.
I respect the earth: Which means I will not be wasteful or destructive of our environment so that generations beyond me will be able to enjoy it.

I don't have any morals; I have respect - and it's all anyone needs.

makita's picture

well said

Very well said. I agree.

AxisofJared's picture

"Public" hate speech and vilification

"Atheists have the right to be safe from public hate speech and vilification."
Hank, in what sense do you mean "public"? If you mean hate speech and vilification as perpetrated by the government, then of course I'm with you. If you mean made by a speech by a citizen in the public square, then I'm not so sure. We all have the right to say what we want, no matter how vile. Maybe you should clarify.

Hank Fox's picture

Gotta disagree a bit here

I suppose technically we all have a "right" to use our rich supply of racial and ethnic slurs when the need strikes us. But ... Don Imus can tell you it sometimes comes with a price.

And rightly so.

To the degree that black people and Jews, for instance, are protected by a broad social conscience that recognizes such slurs as not-okay, THAT is exactly how much I think atheists have the right to be safe from the same kind of thing. I want the same social awareness that *I* too am a human being deserving of common respect.

As it is, we have news reporters, evangelists, mainstream religious leaders, even presidents (one, anyway) blithely saying we're not deserving of respect, or equal rights, or even of consideration as serious, thinking people. They tell lies about us, they mislead people about who and what we are -- what we say, what we want. According to some polls, they trust us only slightly more than child molesters. Substitute ANY ethnic or cultural group in place of "atheists" in the things commonly said about atheists, and the degree of easy vilification is easier to see.

There's a common connection among certain people between atheists and criminality, or atheists and hatefulness.

In the same way, among "certain" people, there's a connection between blacks and criminality. But at least in this case, those stupid people keep their discriminatory ideas to themselves. They don't get to go on the radio or TV, or into print media, and spout them at will.

makita's picture

Looking good

I responded here.

John S. Wilkins's picture

I responded

here...

car253's picture

church noise

I think you should have these rights even if your not an atheist. I am against them forcing religion on you. I never understood this before the catholic church in my neighborhood put up an amplied sound system that they blast 6 times a day every day of the week from 4 bullhorns on top of the church.

I am not an atheist but want peace and quiet in my home. The district attorney says what they are doing is legal. Churches in Los Angeles are exempt from the noise law or they are not under the law. No one should be above the law. I am just looking for what's fair. My city councilmember, Ed Reyes in Los Angeles said he will not change the law. So, I am stuck hearing 4 bullhorns all day every day. So, please include in your writings whether you are atheist or not that you still are entitled to these freedoms.

katylava's picture

"Churches"

We should also have the right to establish tax-exempt community centers which promote secular values and help individuals find moral guidance from an atheist perspective. Seriously.

no matter where you go, there you are

Cat's picture

ya

They should be called "school".

Seriously. I think that all Elementary schools (starting in kindergarden to 3rd grade, but beyond if neccessary) should have basic classes on polite behavior. Morality is a gray area all around though, so that's best left to the parents.

Hank Fox's picture

Morality

"Morality is best left to parents" is something we often hear, or say. But I don't fully agree with it. The reason we say it is because morality has been hijacked by religions. So many of us equate morality with religion that we now shy away from teaching it in any other venue than church or home.

But the very thing you call "politeness" IS morality. Morality common to pretty much all of us, and nothing at all to do with religion. There are certainly gray areas (cultural variations, etc.) -- but I'd bet about 95 percent of morality, from little things like opening doors for older folks, to big things like not killing people, is common enough that it could be easily taught at school. If, that is, we weren't all tiptoeing around the subject, avoiding it, because we mistakenly believe morality equals religion, and teaching morality in school would be teaching religion in school.

Worse, in the transition zone between church-taught goodness and intelligent self-control, our culture is left with a do-it-yourself home school for good behavior. Problem is, having been haphazardly trained themselves, a lot of parents don't have any systematic guidelines that they can pass along to their kids.

This is yet another of the insidious lies forced on us by religion. Until we all learn that morality has no causal connection with religion, that guidelines for good manners and good behavior do not come from gods or holy books, we will continue to drag ourselves and our "civil"-ization down with the weight of silly ancient beliefs.

vjack's picture

I really like where you are

I really like where you are going with this. I'm not sure about #1 though. Given that nobody seems able to define "hate speech" all that effectively, I'd hate for this to be interpreted as meaning that people shouldn't have the right to criticize us. I think the focus should be on things like property damage, physical assault, etc.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content