Don't talk about...

Jim Downey's picture

...fucking Paris Hilton, or the godders will go nuts:


OK, so what happened was that monologist Mike Daisey was giving a performance last week, and well, I'll let him give the details:

Last night's performance of INVINCIBLE SUMMER was disrupted when eighty seven members of a Christian group walked out of the show en masse, and chose to physically attack my work by pouring water on and destroying the original of the show outline.

I'm still dealing with all the ramifications, but here's what it felt like from my end: I am performing the show to a packed house, when suddenly the lights start coming up in the house as a flood of people start walking down the aisles--they looked like a flock of birds who'd been startled, the way they all moved so quickly, and at the same moment...it was shocking, to see them surging down the aisles. The show halted as they fled, and at this moment a member of their group strode up to the table, stood looking down on me and poured water all over the outline, drenching everything in a kind of anti-baptism.

More on his site. But here is the bit that made me want to post about it on UTI:

After the show I told the audience something, and it's been rolling around in my mind. It's common to think things will never happen where you are--never in Cambridge, never in New York, never in Seattle--that sort of thing, whatever it is, never happens here, not in our community. Then it happens, right in front of you, and you realize you were blind to it, that you forgot that intolerance and zealotry and viciousness are human currency everywhere, and it takes your breath away. You want to curl up and pretend it never happened, because they were fools, idiots--you make excuses and move on. Do the next show. Breathe. Forget.

Intolerance. Zealotry. Viciousness.

That, my friends, is the face of the Christian mob. Do not forget it.

Jim Downey

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Jim's picture

Walkout

Reply to Brent
(Info area) Well I know from him(my son) what happened and many others , Mikes site and papers.
(Info area states 87 members of Christian group I’m no genius) They were a public high school choral class really 3 classes, in town for 5 days for a competition, and they won the gold for dance.the 75 kids were made up of Jews, Hindus, Muslums, Christians and mostly mormens. The big hoop la that made world news was all about. Them crazy Jesus freaks.
(ok posted what )Group of 87 Christians. When he knew that night who they were and talk to an administer from the school the next day. You really know nothing more then the clip? You did not read any things on this ?
No I’m not saying Mike is evil or bad, I would say unscrupouls and sinister. I bet he is great in very many ways. (Endangering) Danger no although the kids are well versed in profanity. The public school laws of California does not allow a teacher to take kids to a show like that, with out a consent form signed first .I see no one can seem to understand this ,Yes the teacher and chaperones blew it big time taking the kids there. Maybe they should be killed.
Waterman was very wrong, the other walking out, not one bit wrong .And Mike was very wrong for making this a Christian thing. Hope your starting to get it now, you can read everything I have said all over the blogs. Well I only found one place that told about them trying to leave before Mike even came on stage. As soon as they heard turn of your fucking cell phone deal. stage manger said no can't hold the show .
Hope your starting to get it .
Thanks

John P's picture

Eye for an eye?

I can't help thinking what would happen if 87 actors went to their church, and at the high point of the sermon, all got up and stalked out, en masse, while one of them strode up to the pulpit and poured a glass of water on the Bible?

They'd probably call the cops and arrests would be made for a hate crime.

Jim Downey's picture

Update on Mike Daisey saga

Daisey (the monologist) managed to track down the people who walked out of his performance last week, and his write up of this is worth taking a look at. In particular, he relates talking with the man who poured the water over his notes, and here is the best part:

We have been talking for quite some time, making progress, when I mention offhandedly in response to something that I had been raised Catholic.

At this, he makes this little sound: "oh!" It's a tiny exclamation, upward-inflected. I hear that sound, and my heart sinks.

It's a sound of surprise he makes, and of recognition. Of fellowship. And immediately, everything he says is the same, but it is surrounded with a superstructure of scripture--there are supporting arguments from Jesus, the apostles, the whole nine yards. His cadence and language is entirely different, because now he is drawing on over two thousand years of religious writing to enfold and magnify his arguments.

For the first time in the conversation, in my heart, I am furious.

What was I before that moment? I thought we were trying to speak to one another and I was honest with you--but this is your real face, and I only earn the right to see it if I say the right password and get let into your club.

Who was I before? Was I nobody? Was I simply a *liberal*, the word with the hook on the end of it? A dirty, pornographic artist? A purveyor of filth?

No. It's worse than that, worse than labels. I know the truth. I was no one. I was no one to you, not a real person at all--I wasn't real when you destroyed my work, and until the moment I said the magic word I wasn't real. When he made that sound, he betrayed his heart and finally spoke the truth, and I could see him fully. Now I know him, and now he has no power over me.

Read the whole thing.

Jim Downey

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.

andy's picture

Hmmm

That was an assault and he had every right to defend himself.

I'm pretty sure that no one has been killed by having water poured on their desk in front of them. Granted, the guy doing the damage was an asshole, and there might be the possibility of going after something for property damage, but to paint this as some sort of physical, vicious assault on his body is simply ludicrous.

Such simple, knee-jerk responses make us atheists look as bad as those oppressive theists against whom we contend.

Additionally, it looks from the video like only one person did anything destructive. One out of, what, eighty seven? The other eighty-six did the right thing: they disagreed with it and they left. Good for them (even though I think they are silly for doing so). One person engaging in this act hardly constitutes a mob gone wild.

Crosius's picture

Sure, that would have sent the correct message.

Responding to an act of property damage with personal assault? That's not how you keep the moral high-ground. I don't know how self-defense works in the US, but in Canada you can't escalate the level of force like that. Sean Connery's speech about the "Chicago Way" isn't good legal advice. As long as the assailant doesn't move to interfere with your person, you can't interfere with theirs.

Let them keep viciousness as their tool, not ours.

I think Mr. Daisy reacted perfectly, he confronted his attackers assertively, but with the correct level of reasonable indignation, (which made them run away) and then regained his connection with the audience. He masterfully turned the incident to his advantage. You can bet the message his audience will take home after the show will have nothing to do with what the mob wanted to convey, and everything to do with what Mike Daisy said after the occurrence. A perfect example of a professional artist not giving a critic the last word.

Intelligence, charm and class. Those should be our tools.

Well done, Mr. Daisy.

RoonDog's picture

That's the face of any mob

so caught up in the reflexive, i.e., non-thinking, justice of their perceived cause. Better not to curl up and pretend it never happened. Better to use it as material.

"You better start giving me some inner peace before I mop the floor with you." - Homer S.

or

"Pinky, you excel at random." - the Brain

Milo Johnson's picture

assaulted

The speaker should have grabbed the arm of that fucking little puke and snapped his elbow ninety degrees backwards over the edge of the table. That was an assault and he had every right to defend himself. It's about time these assholes get taught that they don't own the world and that if they want to be part of society they had better learn how to be polite.

plittle's picture

re: assaulted

Hmmm, I'm not there with you on this one. I've never been a big fan of either of the biblical conflict resolution scenarios. Neither "an eye for an eye," nor "turn the other cheek," really strike me as being effective solutions. I think Mr. Daisy handled it very well, and as another commenter mentioned, turned it into an opportunity to more closely connect with his remaining audience.

I think it possible that the little bit of attention this will receive in the blogosphere may lead to Mr. Daisy enjoying a few legitimate sell-outs, which would be the best revenge.

Jim's picture

Mike Daisey WALKOUT

My son was there
One thing most people are missing. It seems to me, Mr Mike Daisey, knew before he posted on youtube, who this group were and came from. In the info area of the clip It states 87 members of a Christian group. why?
I talk to him about this in messages ,he said he had posted before he knew who they were. It does not look that way to me . The one that puts the clips on youtube, are able to pull their clips, and repost, They can remove comments and block viewers from making a comment. Which he did to me.
Day of walk out 4-19-07
Talked with Cindy L. from the school and the man the poured water David 4-20-07 acording to news papers and his site.
Youtube shows posted 4-21-07.
Why? After reading much about Mr. Daisey and his followers. I think I have the answer.
Seems as he forgave 1 and punished 86 others lets not count the other 11 adults just the 75 kids that were 14-17 years of age.
He heard there cries with their comments .
They were high school kids from s. California .there for choral competition.
To date 5-8-07 more info still shows Christian group. He said 4-21-07 is a repost .but he did not amend info

Brent Rasmussen's picture

Daisy'd and Confused

My son was there
One thing most people are missing. It seems to me, Mr Mike Daisey, knew before he posted on youtube, who this group were and came from.

I am not sure I am following you here. So what? He disclaimed his show in advance.

And what exactly does YouTube have to do with anything?

In the info area of the clip It states 87 members of a Christian group. why?

Well, Jim, I'm no genius, but I'd venture to guess that the reason why he said that in the info area of the clip on YouTube is because they were, ahem, 87 members of a Christian group.

Do you dispute this? Again, I am not really following your comments. What is your point?

I talk to him about this in messages ,he said he had posted before he knew who they were. It does not look that way to me . The one that puts the clips on youtube, are able to pull their clips, and repost, They can remove comments and block viewers from making a comment. Which he did to me.

Uh... OK.

Posted what before he knew who who were?

What are you talking about? And why does it matter? Again, so? What does that have to do with us here at UTI?

What . Is . Your . Point?

Day of walk out 4-19-07
Talked with Cindy L. from the school and the man the poured water David 4-20-07 acording to news papers and his site.
Youtube shows posted 4-21-07.
Why? After reading much about Mr. Daisey and his followers. I think I have the answer.
Seems as he forgave 1 and punished 86 others lets not count the other 11 adults just the 75 kids that were 14-17 years of age.
He heard there cries with their comments .
They were high school kids from s. California .there for choral competition.
To date 5-8-07 more info still shows Christian group. He said 4-21-07 is a repost .but he did not amend info

You know what sir? I am just not following you at all.

I truly do apologize, but I cannot puzzle out what you are trying to say or do here.

Are you saying that Mike Daisy is a bad man? A liar? A sinister, evil, child-endangering atheist who should be locked up and kept away from decent Christian folks because of his YouTube commenting policies?

Seriously - I don't know what your point is with all this. Please elaborate and help me understand.

Thanks,

-Brent

Jim's picture

Try reading the news papers

Try reading the news papers .you will find all that you dont understand .I did not need the papers I got it right from the right from the kids.

Jim's picture

walkout

Reply to Brent
(Info area) Well I know from my son what happened and many others , Mikes site and papers.
(Info area states 87 members of Christian group I’m no genius) They were a public high school choral class, really 3 classes in town for 5 days for a competition and they won the gold for dance. The 75 kids were made up of Jews, Hindus, Muslums, Christians and mostly mormens. The big hoop la that made world news was all about. Them crazy Jesus freaks.
(ok posted what )Group of 87 Christians. When he knew that night who they were and talk to an administrator from the school the next day. You really know nothing more then the clip? You did not read any things on this ?
No I’m not saying Mike is evil, I would say unscrupouls and sinister. I bet he is great in very many ways. (Endangering) Danger no although the kids are well versed in profanity. The public school laws of California does not allow a teacher to take kids to a show like that, with out a consent form signed first .I see no one can seem to understand this ,Yes the teacher and chaperones blew it big time taking the kids there. Maybe they should be killed.
Waterman was very wrong, the others walking out, not one bit wrong .And Mike was very wrong for making this a Christian thing. Hope your starting to get it now, you can read everything I have said all over the blogs. Well I only found one place that told about them trying to leave before Mike even came on stage as soon as they heard turn of your fucking cell phone deal. stage manger said no cant hold the show . to bad only took 57 second.
Hope your starting to get it.
Thanks

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content