
Observations and inanities by a second-shift assistant supervisor in the Puppy-Grinding division of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy® (our motto: "Sure it's cruel, but think of the jobs!"), your host, Brent Rasmussen.
"Are you with me, Doctor Woo?*"
(*with apologies to Steely Dan)
So, a couple days ago, I was hitting some of my usual haunts, and on MeFi came across a link to something truly amazing: the most advanced personal energy system available today!
Personal energy system? Huh? Some kind of new sports drink? Maybe a reworked diet fad? Or a new way to charge your, uh, personal massagers?
Nope. They're talking Sympathetic Resonance Technology! Wow! Even the name is impressively scientifical! What is Sympathetic Resonance Technology? I'm glad you asked:
The Q-Link’s fundamental technology can be understood by imagining a tuning fork that vibrates at a certain pitch. Similarly, the Q-Link’s Sympathetic Resonant Technology™ (SRT™) is tuned to optimize the human energy system through resonance. As it interacts with your biofield, it leads to a rebalancing and restoration according to your individual needs.
Oh-oh. Woo alert! Woo alert! How does this supposedly work?
The body creates and sustains its own energy system. That system can be drained and interrupted by rival signals from other electromagnetic systems (e.g. computers, hairdryers etc).
The QLink is encoded with Sympathetic Resonance Technology or SRT™, a pioneering branch of quantum physics. This makes it act as a tuning fork that resonates with the ideal note at which the body's energy system should hum.
The body responds positively to this ideal note and pitches itself to it so that, in time, the ideal and the actual note become harmonised.
See, it's a "pioneering branch of quantum physics", so it must be good, it's so technological and sciencetific. Cool! But what exactly is you get with this QLink thingee? Let's ask a geek person who understands all about electronics and stuff:
Here in the sunshine, some of the nation’s cheekiest electronics geeks examined the QLink. We chucked probes at it, and tried to detect any “frequencies” emitted, with no joy. And then we did what any proper dork does when presented with an interesting device: we broke it open. Drilling down, the first thing we came to was the circuit board. This, we noted with some amusement, was not in any sense connected to the copper coil, and therefore is not powered by it.
The eight copper pads do have some intriguing looking circuit board tracks coming out of them, but they too, on close inspection, are connected to absolutely nothing. A gracious term to describe their purpose might be “decorative”. I’m also not clear if I can call something a “circuit board” when there is no “circuit”.
Finally, there is a modern surface mount electronic component soldered to the centre of the device. It looks impressive, but whatever it is, it is connected to absolutely nothing. Close examination with a magnifying glass, and experiments with a multimeter and oscilloscope, revealed that this component on the “circuit board” is a zero-ohm resistor.
...
And that’s it. No microchip. A coil connected to nothing. And a zero-ohm resistor, which costs half a penny, and is connected to nothing. I contacted qlinkworld.co.uk to discuss my findings. They kindly contacted the inventor, who informed me they have always been clear the QLink does not use electronics components “in a conventional electronic way”. And apparently the energy pattern reprogramming work is done by some finely powdered crystal embedded in the resin. Oh, hang on, I get it: it’s a new age crystal pendant.
A QLink pendant will set you back at least a hundred bucks if you order it from the manufacturer, and they have models up to about a thousand bucks, even some little pendants for your pets, because "Animals have energetic systems too!" And of course, there's one for the golfers out there, to help improve your game!
*sigh*
You know, what really gets to me with this kind of crap is how they're perfectly happy to use scientific terms in a techno-babble stew which would make Star Trek scriptwriters proud. And yet, you can just bet that if you called them on it, they'd backpeddle pretty damned fast (and do, according to Ben Goldacre of Bad Science). Furthermore, a lot of the people who buy this crap will likewise diss science given half a chance, saying that either science doesn't 'have all the answers', or that their religion somehow supercedes scientific principles.
And meanwhile, the Shamen and the scam artists rake in the money. It's very depressing.
Jim Downey
(Cross posted to my blog.)

















Q-link golf
PGA golfer Justin Rose was one of the golfers listed on Q-Link's web page, and his e-mail address was publicly available on his own web page, so I wrote to him. He confirmed he wears the Q-Link, and says it works great. He wore it when he won his first tournament. We didn't discuss his record since. Didn't want to pick on the guy...
Corinthian Leather
Jim-
In Brent's last post, I talked about "spiff technology". This Q-Link device you describe is the same nonsense. I bet they sell millions. The fact is, people fall for this stuff. It's all about salesmanship. Using fancy terms like flux capacitor or Corintihian leather gives an illusion of authority. Good salesman or marketing firms know that the presentation is far more important than the product. I see this sillyness every day in my profession. Bose is the best marketer who makes overpriced junk. Or you can look at the latest fad diet. And you've gotta love our big pharmacutical companies. You see tv commercials about their wonderful new drugs that say go tell your doctor about drug X. Since when is restless leg syndrome a disease that needs medication? Are you kidding me, go for a fucking walk fatty. Spiff technology is everywhere and people love it. There really is a sucker born every minute.
Dirk
Spiffy!
Yeah, Dirk, your comment about 'spiff tech' was dead-on, and I recognized it immediately. I came across this QLink crap a couple of days ago, but didn't have a chance to get it posted, knew when I saw Brent's piece that it would be a good companion, for the reasons you cite.
Now, about leather...you may be amused to know that last week I paid $1000.00 for three skins of bookbinding leather for a project for one of my clients...
Jim Downey
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.
Tanned by Tibetan Monks
Jim-
Make sure you charge triple and give it a special name. Tell your client that the leather was aged and hand tanned by celebate Tibetan monks using the highly advanced UTI method. You don't want your client thinking he has just any old leather on his book. You might think I am kidding, but I am not. The affluent like to feel special. Most of the time, affluent people will buy the more expensive items just because they think it must be better because of the cost or the brand name. I can't tell you how many times I have demo'd a less expensive system only to have the client decide they like the inferior but more expensive system instead. I don't push for an explanation, I just count my money.
It's a very strange world we live in...
Dirk
This was a phenomenon...
This was a phenomenon I saw at work when I owned an art gallery. There were occasions when an artist's work wasn't selling and I told them that what we had to do was to remove it from the gallery for a period (say a year), announce that they had "returned" and tripled their prices, only to see the stuff sell like hotcakes.
*sigh*
Jim Downey
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.
Bose
I've never owned a bose speaker but I do know that they come up with some pretty innovative tech. The latest I saw was a new type of suspension for cars that was featured in Pop-sci. A reduced article is here and the here's the original article.
I smell BS
Rick-
I don't claim to be an electrical engineer specializing in the R&D of audio technology, but I do design home theaters for a living and have been selling audio for almost 10 years now. One of the many brands I sell is Bose. I have sold hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of Bose audio products. However, to friends and family, I tell the truth. Bose is a rip off. I can get you superior performance for far less money by choosing other less well known brands. Bose is a marketing driven company that pretends to be an engineering driven company. I suspect they spend 5 times as much marketing as they do on R&D.
The article you linked to is about Bose going into the automotive industry and making a new suspension system. Knowing what I know about their audio products, I would not be interested in using their parts on my car. Who knows? It could be that Bose makes a great suspension. These are just my opinions. The point of my comment, which I think you missed, is that people shouldn't get fooled by shiny, cool sounding marketing ideas like the Q-Link do dad thingy Jim's article was about.
Doesn't it seem a bit odd to you that Bose could just jump in to the automotive market and come up with a great suspension system out of the blue? I smell bullshit. After all, I am a skeptic, remember?
Dirk
Skepticism
I completely understood your point. If you give it a pretty name and gussy it up with terms that people think are impressive (like artesian water) people will buy.
I'll also take your word that there are more impressive audio products than Bose produces...they just have good marketing... I wouldn't know as I'm not that much of an audiophile.
But being a skeptic, to me, doesn't mean everything you read or see is BS.To me it's just that you view things with a critical eye and an open mind.
Stone Cold Cynic
You are absolutely right. Sometimes I confuse my cynicism with my skepticism. When it comes to advertisements I am a stone cold cynic. I assume they are lying, especially a company like Bose. After all, it is their job to get me to buy. But, as I said before, it is possible Bose makes a good suspension system. I am not a car guy. I would look for an unbiased review before I trusted Bose. In my industry, it is very hard to find such reviews. There are dozens of stereo and hifi trade magazines, but they are all dependant on companies like Bose for their advertising dollars. You will never see an bad review. If I want to know the real low-down on a brand or product I am unfamiliar with, I go to AVSforum.com to talk with other audiophiles and hobbyists.
Thank you for correcting me.
Dirk