
Observations and inanities by a second-shift assistant supervisor in the Puppy-Grinding division of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy® (our motto: "Sure it's cruel, but think of the jobs!"), your host, Brent Rasmussen.
"Just go along."
Many years ago, I read a book which changed how I view the world. It was William Allen's The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town 1922 - 1945. I no longer remember whether I read it for a college class, or just on my own. And I can no longer really tell you many of the details of the book, but there was one overriding lesson I took from it which remains: that most people will go along with changes instituted by authority figures, so long as those changes seem minor and "for the greater good". Because the thing about the Nazi rise to power is that it was enabled by 'good Germans' - the vast population who were not Nazi ideologues, but were unwilling to stand up to incremental infringement of their civil rights because it would be just too much bother.
I see this as a recurring theme in human history. It is the rare individual who will resist such creeping authoritarianism directly, though many others will find ways to subvert or resist passively (as happened in the USSR and Soviet-block countries), and still more often people will just leave a country under an authoritarian regime given the chance. This is a common theme in literature, and certainly in Science Fiction (read just about anything by Heinlein for the most clear-cut examples), so certainly I was familiar with the trope. But to see how it actually played out in one small German town was sobering.
And it is always sobering to see it play out in small ways in our country today. One such example comes from Michael Righi, writing about his experience of being arrested at Circuit City because he refused first to show a store employee his receipt and let his bag be searched, and then for refusing to provide a cop (whom he summoned) a Driver's License. From a summation which Righi sent to BoingBoing:
Today I was arrested by the Brooklyn, Ohio police department. It all started when I refused to show my receipt to the loss prevention employee at Circuit City, and it ended when a police officer arrested me for refusing to provide my driver's license.
There are two interesting stories in one which I thought would be of interest to Boing Boing readers. The first involves the loss prevention employee physically preventing my egress from the property. The second story involves my right as a U.S. citizen to not have to show my papers when asked. (Despite having verbally identified myself, the officer arrested me for failing to provide a driver's license while standing on a sidewalk.)
You can read the full account at Righi's blog, and I would urge you to do so. It is disturbing that he was treated this way, and admirable that he stood up for his rights.
But what is most disturbing are the number of commentors who criticize Righi for doing so. These are your fellow citizens who are perfectly happy to "just go along" in the interests of expediency, efficiency (cost savings), and for the common good. They don't see why Righi should object either to his treatment by Circuit City or by the demand from the police officer that he provide proof of identity.
Now, I'm not saying that the US is in some incipient form of Fascism. But there sure are plenty of people with authoritarian instincts, and even more who are willing to accommodate those instincts in day-to-day life. And that is how rights are lost, freedom forfeit. As Righi puts it:
I understand that my day would have gone a lot smoother if I had agreed to let loss prevention inspect my bag. I understand that my day would have gone a lot smoother if I had agreed to hand over my driver’s license when asked by Officer Arroyo. However, I am not interested in living my life smoothly. I am interested in living my life on strong principles and standing up for my rights as a consumer, a U.S. citizen and a human being. Allowing stores to inspect our bags at will might seem like a trivial matter, but it creates an atmosphere of obedience which is a dangerous thing. Allowing police officers to see our papers at will might seem like a trivial matter, but it creates a fear-of-authority atmosphere which can be all too easily abused.
Jim Downey
(Cross posted to my blog.)


















The police part I
The police part I understand. I do not understand the big deal about showing a receipt.
It's the principal of the thing
Having someone say they have to inspect your bag is basically having them call you a thief. This is especially so if you've seen people go out the door without having their bag inspected. Maybe where you live it's different, but I've never once, in all the years I've been shopping, had to allow someone to inspect my bag. So for me it would be a pretty big thing if someone suddenly asked to inspect my receipt and the contents of my bag.
"If there is evil in this world, it lurks within the hearts of men" ~Edward D. Morrison, Tales of Phantasia
once
This happened to me once and because of the high cost to us all from shoplifting, I was happy to cooperate. I did not feel at all like I was being called a thief but rather that the store was letting potential shoplifters know that they could be asked to show a receipt for everything being carrying out of the store. However, after reading your comment and The Colonel's, it seems that I have some thinking to do. I would be furious to learn that this practice is used to target minority groups. Thank you.
Yep, gotta' agree.
The receipt thing is quite a big deal. It's simply search without probable cause. I don't think there is any legal grist for having to show a receipt to anyone, unless you've been charged and are proving your innocence. For me, it goes so far as to be a Constituional issue.
-Col.
Because the thing about the
And who, considering the conditions at the time, were more than happy to blame the economic trouble Germany was experiencing on certain minority groups. Minority groups that, not being white/Christian, could safely be considered unlawful. Heck you can see the same sort of movement with illegal immigrants, all this "those people just come over the boarder so they can steal our jobs" sounds like the sort of thing that could easily lead to acceptance of abuse of said illegal immigrants. You can see it when people so calmly accept that if some horrible thing takes place it must have been done by a Jew, or a Negro, or an Atheist, or a Muslim or a teenager or any of the many groups people love to blame. In the way people are so willing to make laws that penalize others because they figure they will never be on the receiving end of those laws.
Stand up for yourself (F-Bush)
Good for Mr. Righi. Actually, I have done something kind of similar. However, it didn't go quite that far. A few years ago, I was almost arrested for refusing to take a bumper sticker off my car. It was only a few weeks into the Iraq war. I was pissed that Bush was blatantly lying about his reasons for going to war and I bought a "Fuck Bush" bumper sticker, t-shirt and coffee mug from some website.
I was living in North Conway, New Hampshire at the time. I was driving down the main drag of the town when seemingly out of the blue a cop turns his lights and siren signaling me to pull over. I pulled over and asked what the problem was? I was pretty sure I hadn't violated any traffic laws and figured they were messing with me because I still had New Jersey license plates on my truck so I had a bit of an attitude. It turns out some lady called the police about my "Fuck Bush" bumper sticker. The cop told me I had to take it off. I refused and he threatened to arrest me for vulgarity or indecency (I can't remember his exact words). I still refused and told him that it was my right according to the first amendment. I was very upset at this point and was accusing the cop of violating my right to free speech. Two more cop cars were called and I was told to wait (the whole incident took at least a half hour). Apparently, they must have called someone because eventually they said I could go. No apology and they made sure I knew they would be keeping their eye on me. Idiots.
I will have to check out Righi's blog. I love a guy with guts who is willing to stand up for his rights. His story reminds me of the couple that was arrested for wearing anti-Bush t-shirts at a Bush rally. I wonder if Righi will sue, the anti-Bush demonstrators won $80 grand in their lawsuit?
North Conway
Nothing to do with politics, just geography. I am a frequent visitor to North Conway and the mountains thereabouts have seen my feet many times. The latest, just a few days past, was North Moat just outside town. A very pretty area that.
Thameron- I recommend you
Thameron-
I recommend you remain a frequent visitor and not a resident. I lived there for about 4 years. Yes, the scenery is very pretty and the skiing is great, but I don't ever want to live in another small town. Everyone was a churchgoer and busybody. And the snow was ridiculous.
Dirk
Fair weather visitor
Well the possibility of moving to North Conway remains somewhat remote for now. I lived for a long time in a small town so that wouldn't be the big issue. The big issue would be the traffic in the summertime. I have seen that grow to ridiculous proportions there. Since I have been gifted with a substandard set of knees skiing was never a hobby of mine (I generally trudge through the snow rather than gliding gracefully over the top of it). The churchgoing also isn't a deal breaker, but one thing I have heard is that the people there are on the conservative side and after 6 long years of bushy neocon hell I don't think I could abide that and remain civil.
Because the thing about the
Because the thing about the Nazi rise to power is that it was enabled by 'good Germans' - the vast population who were not Nazi ideologues, but were unwilling to stand up to incremental infringement of their civil rights because it would be just too much bother.
Which is precisely why that evil authoritarian bastard we lovingly refer to as FDR bombed the living bejesus out of all of them - good and bad alike.