"I believe in UFO's because I've seen one." -Dennis Kucinich

Miroslav Provod centrum11@volny.cz

Cells versus capacitors

During the experiments regarding cells and capacitors, we have seen yet unpublished properties, which could explain phenomena that have been thought of as mysteries till now. These could show many other solutions. Because there are new terms used in the results I will try to demonstrate these new findings on three natural phenomena.

On cellular membranes, there is spontaneus transformation of cosmic energy into electric energy if they are located in energetic overcharge in the same way as on the electrodes of capacitors. If two or more auras of matters are interconnected their auras merge into a bigger common aura and then their energetic values are equalised.

If we think about the human body according to the new knowledge, we could say that bilions of cells are in contact and their auras overlap, which means that the whole body has a common aura. This phenomenon works not only in between the human cells but also in electronics. The memory of a computer comprises of a great amount of miniature condensers and is able to store information in the form of 0’s and 1’s (0 = there is no charge, 1 = there is charge). Therefore, we could say that human body and electronics have some similar properties. This tells us that if the charge is increased it could cause harm not only to cells in the human body but also to electronics (this could be proved by some simple experiments).

According to the procedure that I’m describing in the article “Dowsing versus aura” it is easy to prove the reactions of energetic parts of water flows (aura, zones, interzones). By this we get an idea about the energy of small water flows and we could orientate in the energetic properties of great water flows more easily. By this I mean sea currents. There are many of these and their flow is in the order of hundreds of millions m3/sec and it could be assumed that they are in interaction with large streams around the Earth. The Gulf stream has various bends and meanders where there is multiple energetic concentration. In the Sargas sea there are also whirlpools whose diameter reaches up to 300km and they reach depth of 5000m. These further increase the local energetic concentration. These places could be thought of as critical from the point of view of further energetic increase from other sources, which could be thunderstorm clouds, moon, planets and other sources. Also, the planes that have been lost in this area could have connection with energetic overvoltage.

The zones of the Gulf stream copy in the shapes of cylindrical shells the US East coast. The energy of one of these zones could be artificially significantly increased by the use of groups of great capacitance capacitors and this would create a barrier that would destroy all organisms and electronics. However, there is a great amount of sea currents and this gives us the opportunity to built such a barrier anywhere on the Earth. This piece of knowledge could also be used for other purposes.

This knowledge about the energetic overvoltage of cells could also explain a strange phenomenon that occurred in the streets of capital of Nairobi on 24.July 1956 at 15:00 (03:00p.m.). About 200 men and women danced on the main street in Nairobi. The dancing people had a regretful look in their faces such as if they danced because they were forced to dance. It wasn’t possible to communicate with them and they didn’t perceive anyone who asked them a question. One hour later, there were 20.000 men, women and children dancing. Eventually, there were about 50.000 people dancing in a strict circle whose diameter was 3.5 kilometres. It looked like they weren’t perceiving anything but they kept about a metre of space between them and they didn’t bump into anyone. It’s interesting that even older people could dance in this dancing marathon for about 5 hours without any visible signs of getting tired. Later accounts of the dancing showed that they didn’t remember anything because their sences were totally crippled. Their memory and thinking didn’t work. It’s very interesting that even that there was no music playing with this dance all the dancers kept the same rhytm.

In this magic circle, not all the people were dancing. The dancers were those who had some metal objects such as coins in their pockets. The dance participants later realised a feeling that their body gained energy from these metal objects. Everything suddenly ended =at 20:00 (08:00p.m.). Nobody has been hurt or dead. This is a very rare phenomenon, which was also noted with some differences in Rheinland at spring equinox in 1374. Between 1871 – 1878 in the Savoy there was an epidemic obsession in women monasteries that was changing into diabolic feakout. The cause of these incomprehensible events hasn’t been found yet.

The knowledge of the empiric research also gives us an explanation of this mysterious event. People that were affected by the dance were located in the energetic space of the town that had greater energetic overcharge than the optimal cellular charge. This caused greater charge on the cells (including brains cells) and was followed by disorder of thinking. The fact that is peculiar on this event is that even older people didn’t feel tired after 5 hours long dancing. Not less interesting is the information that only those people that had metal objects in their pockets were affected by the dance. Three great time intervals between similar events show that the energetic overcharge could be caused by astronomical influences. I don’t doubt that similar anomalies in the region of aura could also be created by groups of great capacitance capacitors, which would create optimally enhanced overcharge in this given region. We noticed similar health disorders during the experimetns, but we interrupted such experiments due to the possibility of health damage. The fact that similar situation can’t be evoked by the people that don’t have metal with them prompts us to many useful applications. Bank robbers usually have metal objects with them, but bank workers don’t, so a button could be pressed and the bank robbers would give us a dance before the police arrives. There are many other such applications.

Another mysterious event, which could be assigned to the zones of the cosmic energy is the spontane human combustion (SHC). The spontane human combustion is one of the most controversial phenomena for serious researchers. The spontane combustion means that human body could be ignited without any optically noticed source. Very intense and unbelievably localised fire transforms most of the human body into ash. In many cases part of a limb, like a leg, remains untouched. Similarly, some parts of clothes or surrounding objects remain untouched. Nothing similar exists in nature that would be similar to those fires and the accompanying phenomena don’t follow laws of physics and findings of medicine. Some researchers also describe this phenomenon by “candlewick effect”. They wrap a body of a pig into a sheet and leave it slowly burning all day. They forget about the fact that the process of burning during SHC happenes in a matters of seconds, not hours. There is a great amount of information about this phenomenon on the internet and therefore I won’t further describe it, but will limit myself only to the classification from our research’s point of view.

Cellular membranes have a capacity of about (1µF/cm2), which means that they work like a capacitor. If we keep increasing the charge on a capacitor after reaching the threshold value, which is the maximum value up to which it’s sized, the isolator would eventually brake and in that moment, all the energy is released and the capacitor is destoryed. Similar disastrous process happens with billions of cells in humans. When the threshold energetic value for which nature sized our cells is reached, the cells explode in the same way as capacitors do.

I have written about three different phenomena, which by their specific show confirm functionality of other properties of cells and condensers. I would be delighted if some research centers used this new knowledge.

April 2008

Miroslav Provod

http://www.miroslavprovod.com

I watched the debate. His explanation was that he didn't know what it was, it was unidentified. He made a joke about moving his campaign headquarters to Roswell. I believe it's a non-issue, but who knows.

Simply seeing a UFO doesn't register as kooky with me. It really just means an Unidentified Flying Object. I don't start getting worried until someone starts talking about the origin of the UFO or talking about why the UFO was here. I don't really see spacecraft from another planet being equipped with technology that enables travel at superluminal speeds having cloaking technology so poor that lets them be seen by people whose credibility as eyewitnesses was established by one appearance on TV describing how the tornado sounded coming through their trailer park. UFOs coming from another dimension seems less probable than ones from another planet because at least other planets have been discovered. There are preliminary indications that other planets have, or at least had, life as well. That the extraterrestrials can come to earth, park their craft above a home, levitate out an occupant, molest them and then put them back without the neighbors noticing seems unlikely since all they have to do is simply fly over a trailer park and have no less than 20 people see them. A related idea that they are collecting cow anuses seems even less likely. The hollow earth thing is just silly.

So until Kucinich elaborates on what he thinks he saw or why he thinks they are here, I can't make any reasonable judgments.

Do I believe in any of the above? No. I had a phase when I was younger where I read everything I could about UFOs, the Loch Ness monster, ghosts, Sasquatch, the Bermuda triangle, the Winchester House, randomly appearing portals to different time periods, spontaneous human combustion, dinosaurs living in the Amazon basin, the face on Mars, stigmata, psychokinesis, telepathy, reincarnation, miracles, etc. I hit puberty and realized that the world just wasn't cool enough to have any of that stuff be real. The evidence just wasn't there for any of it. The arguments against them were more plausible than any of the arguments for them. You need a breeding population of Nessies, Sasquatches, dinosaurs, etc. The superstructure that NASA doesn't want you to know about is just a trick of light, shadows and poor resolution image. There isn't really any good working hypothesis of how psychic abilities are supposed to work. You get the idea.

The more I read the more the claims started contradicting themselves. Where do UFOs come from? Space, parallel dimensions, the hollow earth or even from a future time period? It wasn't impossible that it was all 4, but the absurdities just compounded themselves. And with no evidence to back any of it up, I eventually gave up trying to figure out what was most probable. I applied the same sort of logic to everything else paranormal.

Off the topic of Kucinich, but on the topic of UFOs: has anyone else seen the stories on these drones and the supposed technology behind them?

--
"Ponies are atheists, you know, technically."
- Me

Well, the good thing about Kucinich is everything he's been saying about Iraq and Iran is true and right.
The bad thing is now he'll be portrayed as a lunatic. End of story.

Making points about flag-pin wearing and such is just a waste of political capital. He should be frying bigger fish.

I would sum up UFO's as:
- Almost certainly there would be alien civilizations somewhere
- Chances they've visited here during my lifetime? Nil.
- Chances aliens would disembowell cows and tromp patterns into our crops? Even less.
- Of course we will see weird stuff up in the sky. Doesn't mean much.

Who says UFOs are supernatural? It's possible that a UFO is of earthly origin -- perfectly natural. Or that it's of extra-terrestrial origin yet perfectly natural. I've never seen one and I do believe much talk in this area is bogus fantasy or even superstition. But I can't reject someone out of hand for saying he believes in UFOs as I might if they say they saw a leprechaun.

I sort of enjoyed the debates but after a while it started making me gag. I don't like Clinton or Obama. Edwards, Dodd or Kucinich are more likely to say what I want to hear. Biden does not say what I want to hear but I kind of admire his frankness and confidence. I'll vote in the primary but have not decided who for.

He did emphasize that UFO stood for unidentified flying object. On the other hand, he hangs around John Hagelin and the kooks at the Maharishi Institute in Fairfield, IA. He's nuttier than a can of Planter's peanuts, but no worse than folks like Obama and Clinton who keep slapping a yet another coat of Jesus semigloss on their rhetoric.

in UFO's only to the extent that you can see things flying in the sky and not know what they are. I think it's improbable that we're regularly visited by aliens.

Re UFOs. I would have to say that although I havent seen one myself*, I consider the existence of UFOs within the realm of the natural, and is therefore capable of being investigated objectively. There are just too many sightings to ignore and is therefore worthy of an unbiased investigation. I notice that in the US, there is a tendency to dismiss such sightings or evidence and stigmatize those who claim to have been abducted, even though these 'abductees' need help and compassion. In China, UFO research holds no such stigma, probably because they do not have a Western scientific tradition.

So yeah, list me under the UFO column. The Universe is just so vast that it would be arrogant to think that we're the only intelligence here.

-----
*I have this memory of having seen one when I was a kid, but Im not sure if it was a real memory or a dream I had.

Ron Paul intrigues me... his religious views and some of his social stances I don't agree with, but he is someone who has proven to stay true to his own views and go against the party line (including voting against the Iraq resolution)... so as much as I don't agree with him on everything that he isn't just another stooge sure sets him apart from anyone else I see running for either party. He's something of a libertarian, definitely doesn't hurt him in my books.

Maybe he meant it literally? He saw something he has yet to explain (hence, a truly unidentified flying object) but he doesn't necessarily believe it was aliens from outer space. Regardless, I can't vote for the guy, not because of UFOs, but because he is sixty one and is married to a woman who is half his age (30). Ya, I know, I'm supposed to be giving him a virtual high five for tapping that hot young ass! Forget it. He's grandfather married and he's married to someone who should be hanging out with his daughter. We all know why young attractive women marry rich, powerful older men. So why do those men marry them? I think we all know the reason as well and it doesn't make me think very highly of either of them.