Death of a woman.

Jim Downey's picture

Friends, this is what our war has brought:

Mother who defied the killers is gunned down

Five weeks ago Leila Hussein told The Observer the chilling story of how her husband had killed their 17-year-old daughter over her friendship with a British soldier in Basra. Now Leila, who had been in hiding, has been murdered - gunned down in cold blood. Afif Sarhan in Basra and Caroline Davies report on the final act of a brutal tragedy.

Leila Hussein lived her last few weeks in terror. Moving constantly from safe house to safe house, she dared to stay no longer than four days at each. It was the price she was forced to pay after denouncing and divorcing her husband - the man she witnessed suffocate, stamp on, then stab their young daughter Rand in a brutal 'honour' killing for which he has shown no remorse.

Though she feared reprisals for speaking out, she really believed that she would soon be safe. Arrangements were well under way to smuggle her to the Jordanian capital, Amman. In fact, she was on her way to meet the person who would help her escape when a car drew up alongside her and two other women who were walking her to a taxi. Five bullets were fired: three of them hit Leila, 41. She died in hospital after futile attempts to save her.

Her death, on 17 May, is the shocking denouement to a tragedy which had its origins in an innocent friendship between her student daughter, Rand Abdel-Qader, 17, and a blond, 22-year-old British soldier known only as Paul.

This is fucked up so many different ways, it is hard to know where to begin. But start with the initial report of the daughter's death:

Rand Abdel-Qader, 17, told her closest friend that she was in love from the moment she set eyes on the young British soldier working alongside her in Basra, and she dreamed of a future with him.

It was an innocent infatuation but five months after Rand, a student of English at Basra University, met Paul, a 22-year-old soldier posted to southern Iraq, she was dead. She was stamped on, suffocated and stabbed by her father. Several brutal knife wounds punctured her slender, bruised body - from her face to her feet. He had done it, he proclaimed to the neighbours who soon gathered round, to 'cleanse his honour'.

* * *

'I screamed and called out for her two brothers so they could get their father away from her. But when he told them the reason, instead of saving her they helped him end her life,' she (the mother, Leila) said.

* * *

At the police station where the father was held Sergeant Ali Jabbar told The Observer last week: 'Not much can be done when we have an "honour killing" case. You are in a Muslim society and women should live under religious laws.'

Wrap your head around that. The father, with the help of her two brothers, killed his daughter for talking with a British soldier. And then he wasn't even charged, because of religion.

And of course, the story doesn't stop there:

Two weeks after The Observer revealed the shocking story of Rand Abdel-Qader, 17, murdered because of her infatuation with a British soldier in Basra, southern Iraq, her father is defiant. Sitting in the front garden of his well-kept home in the city's Al-Fursi district, he remains a free man, despite having stamped on, suffocated and then stabbed his student daughter to death.

Abdel-Qader, 46, a government employee, was initially arrested but released after two hours. Astonishingly, he said, police congratulated him on what he had done. 'They are men and know what honour is,' he said.

* * *

He said his daughter's 'bad genes were passed on from her mother'. Rand's mother, 41, remains in hiding after divorcing her husband in the immediate aftermath of the killing, living in fear of retribution from his family. She also still bears the scars of the severe beating he inflicted on her, breaking her arm in the process, when she told him she was going. 'They cannot accept me leaving him. When I first left I went to a cousin's home, but every day they were delivering notes to my door saying I was a prostitute and deserved the same death as Rand,' she said.

'She was killed by animals. Every night when go to bed I remember the face of Rand calling for help while her father and brothers ended her life,' she said, tears streaming down her face.

And now the mother is dead, as well.

This morning on the Diane Rehm show I heard a woman call in during a discussion about the Democratic primary. She said, as I have heard other Clinton supports say, that what was happening was nothing less than sexism run roughshod over the rights of women, and that the compromise to give the Michigan and Florida delegates one-half vote at the convention was akin to the '3/5 personhood' for slaves in the original US Constitution, for purposes of apportioning representation in Congress. And she said, as so many other Clinton supporters have said, that she would vote for John McCain if Clinton did not receive the Democratic nomination.

John McCain. Who not only supports the war in Iraq, but thinks that things are going great there.

And the case of Leila Hussein and her daughter Rand is just one example of what our war has led to. Just one example of what it really means for a woman to not have anything approaching equality. Just one example of what happens when a religion is allowed to make law. Just one example of what John McCain wants us to see continue.

Think about that.

Jim Downey

(Via Pharyngula. Cross posted to dKos.)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Brent Rasmussen's picture

The Gentle Religion Of Peace

The whole "you're forcing me to kill you" vibe really turns my stomach. The murderer having the gall to blame the victim and to claim victimhood themselves is just - well, stomach-turning.

Ain't religion wonderful? I'll bet that murderous fuck feels really spiritual now that he's killed his own daughter and wife. Practically guaranteed his spot in paradise, I'd imagine.

If that's what it takes to get to paradise, I don't want to be there.

Thameron's picture

Oh but it is the religion of peace

Tell me, who are more peaceful than the dead?

Jim Downey's picture

And if . . .

If that's what it takes to get to paradise, I don't want to be there.

And if that's the sorts who are there, I don't wanna be.

Jim Downey

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read *or listen to* my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.

sinned34's picture

Honour

I want absolutely nothing to do with any kind of "honour" system whereby it's considered appropriate to stomp your sixteen year old daughter to death for ANY reason!

I don't blame Islam specifically for this, although religion certainly can be an enabling feature for demented scum like that man and his sons!

wantobe's picture

Something tells me...

...that if it hadn't been a cute, blond British soldier that this girl was killed over it would have been something else. I don't want to get into an argument over the merits of the Iraq war, but this is clearly a case of Islamic religious nuttery that is found in many Muslim countries, whether we've invaded them or not.

I'm not even sure you can entirely blame the religion for this father's actions, because it takes a special kind of animal to kill your own daughter in cold blood. Religion is the reason he can get away with it, apparently, but not the reason he (and his sons) are such cretins. It's a convenient excuse for them, and gets them off the hook, but people like that will always find an excuse to do what they do.

Rob Miles
--
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.

Neil the password forgetter's picture

I am all for personal responsibility...

too bad we in the west are so horrible at it.

Something tells me...that if it hadn't been a cute, blond British soldier that this girl was killed over it would have been something else.

Perhaps.
I don't seek to justify the murderous actions of the father and sons. But I am really amazed at the absolute refusal of any possible blame for the west. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt, you know?

Don't get me wrong. I detest these actions. I detest the religion and culture that gives them approval. I hope to see some change in my lifetime. But to pretend that this person wasn't enabled and encouraged by both his religion and the situation in Iraq is absurd. We are the reason that the soldier(invading soldier, remember) was there in the first place. We are the reason that the region is so destabilized that there might as well be no police or laws at all. We are at least part of the reason that radical Islam is what it is today.

But I suppose this guy should just let his daughter be a free-love flower child. Nevermind the fact that in this situation, he could be jeopardizing the rest of his family if he didn't take some kind of action. Never mind that he has likely been brainwashed to hate women and westerners all his life, and has had these fears quite well validated lately. Nope. His religion can't be blamed, and neither can our imperialist invasion, because we all know that God and Country can NEVER be wrong. He's just a bad guy.
Of course America were invaded tomorrow, and one of our beautiful daughters were to be caught romancing the enemy, no American would ever do such a horrific thing. We would just call on our perfect soldier-saviours, have her arrested and hanged for treason. Completely and totally different, obviously.

Sorry if I seem a little bitter on this topic. The man and his sons should be executed, if there is to be any shade of justice. But I will not deny our own complicity in the making of these monsters.

wantobe's picture

That dog just don't hunt

Sorry, Neil, as a Westerner I simply don't accept responsibility for this or any other Islamic honor killing. Muslims were committing them long before we invaded Iraq, and they've been doing it all over the world. Yes, the British boy was there because of the invasion of Iraq, but there's every reason to believe that any number of situations would have led to the same result:

"Honour" killings of women can be defined as acts of murder in which "a woman is killed for her actual or perceived immoral behavior." (Yasmeen Hassan, "The Fate of Pakistani Women," International Herald Tribune, May 25, 1999.) Such "immoral behavior" may take the form of marital infidelity, refusing to submit to an arranged marriage, demanding a divorce, flirting with or receiving phone calls from men, failing to serve a meal on time, or -- grotesquely -- "allowing herself" to be raped. In the Turkish province of Sanliurfa, one young woman's "throat was slit in the town square because a love ballad was dedicated to her over the radio." (Pelin Turgut, "'Honour' Killings Still Plague Turkish Province," The Toronto Star, May 14, 1998.)

That's from http://www.gendercide.org/case_honour.html, by the way.

I'm sure there are some Americans who would do what you described above were that situation to occur. Middle-easterners haven't cornered the market (yet) on bug-shit crazy, and we have plenty of our own. But if our Western society is indeed so decrepit that "we" would have soldiers arrest and hang a girl for treason because she "romanced" the enemy, I wouldn't blame that on the invaders.

Rob Miles
--
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.

ERS's picture

Rob Is Right

These crimes pre-date Islam by centuries and have more to do with culture than with faith. The father in this case was a violent monster. He was abusive to both his wife and his daughter even before the British soldier entered the picture. And, by all accounts, this was a totally chaste teenage crush on Rand's part.

Unfortunately, once her daughter was murdered and she courageously chose to leave her violent, unapologetic husband, Leila Hussein became a woman at very high risk. This is a tragedy on top of another tragedy.

Ellen R. Sheeley, Author
"Reclaiming Honor in Jordan"
http://www.redroom.com/author/ellen-r-sheeley

wantobe's picture

Thanks, Ellen

Do you realize how rare it is, either in real life or on groups like this, that the words "Rob is right" get said? You've made my day!

Rob Miles
--
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.

ERS's picture

RIR

Well, you are right about this. :-)

Ellen Sheeley

iheartmitochondria's picture

Haha....my husband has the

Haha....my husband has the same response when I say "James is right." :-)

Yeah, but I agree with you too. Religion is hard to separate from culture, and I don't think that its necessarily the religious belief that causes so many problems. Abolishing religion would be a start, but it wouldn't end all problems. I think the real problem is human nature that wants to fall back on something else to justify their knee-jerk reactions.

Back in my uber-christian days I remember being disgusted by the lack of devoutness by even the most devoted church goers in my church. What can I say? I value honesty a lot, and if you say you believe something, I expect you to take it all the way.

littlehorn's picture

Agreed. Also, it is quite

Agreed.

Also, it is quite unsurprising to hear a story about the death of a woman who was sympathizing with a foreign soldier.

To blame these incidents on the invasion is a mistake, as Miles just explained. Even if we took this premise to be true, it is also a mistake to say these incidents prove we shouldn't have invaded. I would say the Bush crowd would want to stay even more.

The whole theme of the Iraq War was never to avoid civilian suffering. It was to intervene, to liberate a country and to "do the right thing". Remember the "rape rooms" Bush was talking about. The lives of civilians always came second.

So yes it is horrible, but no it doesn't undermine the case for the war in Iraq.

Neil the password forgetter's picture

Does anybody really believe

that this war was or is about anything, anything at all, other than oil and continued profiteering for the oil and arms industries? And if so, please explain how you could come to this conclusion.

The whole theme of the Iraq War was never to avoid civilian suffering. It was to intervene, to liberate a country and to "do the right thing". Remember the "rape rooms" Bush was talking about. The lives of civilians always came second.

I can agree with you that civilian suffering was never an issue for Bush and Co. Not the least of an issue. But Iraq needed "liberating" by the U.S. like they needed a few extra holes in the head. All the neo-cons have done, entirely on purpose, is destabilize a growing nation and hand it back to the same lunatic fundamentalist warlords that it took Saddam Hussein 30 years to put down.

So yes it is horrible, but no it doesn't undermine the case for the war in Iraq.

Sorry to shine some reality your way, but there never was a case for the Iraq war, except as outlined above. Show me a single piece of evidence that human rights or liberty were ever issues in this conflict.

I can't believe people still talk as if this is an issue. It reminds me of when Farenheit 911 came out. I'm no big fan of Michael Moore's pseudo-confrontational tactics, but I never heard ONE SINGLE rebuttal of any point made in that film. I never heard one Bush supporter challenge one fact of Moore's case. Just a bunch of whining about how one-sided his movie was, as if he should have used his film to promote neo-con lies when they already had almost every news outlet on their side! This war was deliberately planned and executed by deception and jingoism, against the will of over half of the country, to profit a small but influential minority of republican warmongers.

This sad murder is just one more symptom. I'm sure both of those ladies are enjoying their "liberation." Now if we can just "liberate" America from Republican rule.

littlehorn's picture

You got me the wrong way. I

You got me the wrong way.

I was against the war from day one, as I am a non-interventionist. I do not say, much less think, there is a case for war. I say this incident doesn't undermine the "case for war", because of how it was propagandized, in part as a way to liberate a country.

Michael Moore does more than pseudo-confrontational tactics, he also uses tricks to make people look like idiots. I am with him on his fight, but his methods are sick. He needs to come clean with this if he wants to go anywhere.

There are a few things you say that i believe are wrong:
1/

This war was deliberately planned and executed by deception and jingoism, against the will of over half of the country, to profit a small but influential minority of republican warmongers.

Against the will of over half of the country ? No. It was planned, executed by deception and jingoism, as ALL wars are, and it easily won public support. The American People didn't see through the lies, and didn't care until the troops started coming home to rest forever.

2/

Show me a single piece of evidence that human rights or liberty were ever issues in this conflict.

I think I can imagine why you're making this point: you haven't left the interventionist mindset. To say you shouldn't have intervened, you must say there was no reason to intervene.
It was a dictatorship. To say there were no liberty or human rights issues is just plain ridiculous.
The point is, even if there were such things, they did not justify going to war. There is injustice everywhere, and it is not up to some foreign country on the other side of the planet to set everything right with deadly force.

3/

All the neo-cons have done, entirely on purpose, is destabilize a growing nation and hand it back to the same lunatic fundamentalist warlords that it took Saddam Hussein 30 years to put down.

Warlords in Iraq ? I think you're confusing Iraq with Afghanistan. Also, warlords are not fundamentalists. At least not in Afghanistan, to the contrary. The Talibans had to fight these guys to get to power and indeed, the neocons relied on these guys in the war on Afghanistan. And today, the warlords control much of Afghanistan, especially the opium fields. But I don't remember having read anything about warlords in Iraq.

4/

I'm sure both of those ladies are enjoying their "liberation." Now if we can just "liberate" America from Republican rule.

Democrats voted for the war and still refuse to withdraw, even though they have the Congress. The US is staying in Iraq no matter what happens in november. Remember that there are, still to this day, US troops in Germany and Japan.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content