A Barrier Too Great

Brent Rasmussen's picture


[Hillary Clinton] That is our duty, to build that bright future, to teach our children that, in America, there is no chasm too deep, no barrier too great, no ceiling too high for all who work hard, who keep going, have faith in God, in our country, and each other.

To all the atheist children out there - sorry, but you're screwed. Apparently for them there is indeed a chasm too deep, a barrier too wide, and a ceiling too high. It's called "acceptance into the Democratic party".

I'm sorry, but I just am seriously uncomfortable with both major-party candidates at this point.

McCain is, well, McCain - a Republican who panders to the religious right. And Obama is a member of the Democratic party which seems to be hellbent-for-leather to exclude atheists, agnostics, and secular folks from their ranks at all costs this year. (And WTF is that all about, anyway?)

Obama sounds good on church-state separation issues, but he's so incredibly inexperienced, that I have reservations about voting for him. In the same way that I would never hire an inexperienced technician for my department, I don't think I'll be able to "hire" Obama for the position of my President.

McCain isn't as far-right as he's been made out to be this year, and he has a pretty good track record of working well across the aisle, and he's a bona-fide war hero which I like. However, he also says some pretty stupid things about how this country is a "Christian Nation", and that just turn me right off. He might just be pandering to the religious folks to counter his moderate image, but it still troubles me greatly.

Bob Barr is my party's candidate, but he's just a Republican who secured the Libertarian nomination by virtue of being the highest-profile politician ever willing to pretend like they are a Libertarian. And the Libertarians fell all over themselves nominating him as quickly as they possibly could. He's farther-right than McCain in my view. Bleh.

All I know is that I've been voting since I was 18 and I have never gotten this close to an Presidential election without a friggin' clue who I'm going to vote for. It's scary.

I think I may end up writing-in Jim Downey. ;)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Jim Downey's picture

McCain selects a Creationist - supporter.

Well, anyone who was considering McCain should look at who he has chosen for VP - Palin supports"teaching the controversy".

The volatile issue of teaching creation science in public schools popped up in the Alaska governor's race this week when Republican Sarah Palin said she thinks creationism should be taught alongside evolution in the state's public classrooms.

Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, 'Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.'

Jim Downey

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read *or listen to* my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.

Brent Rasmussen's picture

Oy, Vey...

Welp, that clinches it. Obama gets my vote.

Unless of course I am swayed by the powerful presidential campaign juggernaut that is the Jim Downey / Hank Fox ticket.

Claybow's picture

I think ...

...that Obama is the better choice. I agree that his experience in governing is less than we might desire, but he's smart and is not afraid to surround himself with other smart people. As he begins choosing his cabinet and making federal judge appointments, I think we'll see the results. Plus, he won't pretend that science is a dirty word.

Any twelve people who can't get themselves out of jury duty are not my peers.
______________________
Claybow

Jim Downey's picture

Wait . . .

. . . you think Obama is a better choice than me? Hell, I was almost mayor of my small town in Iowa once, just got beat by 133 votes! And I've been King twice!! Run my own business, and had to make payroll!!! I don't look very good in a bikini, but I am a good shot!!!!

Jim Downey

(And yes, all those things are true. I've led a weird life.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read *or listen to* my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.

wantobe's picture

That certainly catches my attention

Does anybody know if Palin has officially done anything to promote the teaching of ID?

Rob Miles
--
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.

Kentucky Boy's picture

not to my knowledge

but you can bet she would have signed a "teach the controversy" bill if one had landed on her desk, just like Bobby Jindal did.

terry's picture

Seems

neither party wants my vote

frankmoorman's picture

Heroism

I liked the discussion about McCain and heroism. My father was a career Army officer, West Point graduate (1934), who parachuted into Normandy as signal officer and later staff officer (G-4) for the 82d Airborne Division. He would refuse the label of hero, in part because he felt he was doing his job and in part because he would not have felt that he exceeded what was expected of any soldier in combat.

Nor would he have felt that his military experience, which later included command and diplomatic responsibilities, would have in any way qualified him to be president. He also once told me that there was a time in the Army when being wounded or captured was considered a mistake and that there was some disagreement at the time about awarding a Purple Heart for making a mistake.

In any event, he had a higher standard for heroism than our common public discussion seems to hold.

I watched odds and ends of the speeches last night and noticed that the "god bless" statements became so prevalent that it was more interesting to note who did not say it, particularly when it was John Kerry, who is a practicing Catholic, perhaps wary of overusing the statement for fear of trivializing it.

As far as I'm concerned, the god thing is just part of the background we live in. I have little expectation of avoiding it, and I will vote for Obama because, to my mind, he does offer more promise than the alternative. I think, in many ways, we're screwed beyond anybody's power to fix it, and I would just rather go down with better company if it is possible.

Frank Moorman, skeptic

Crudely Wrott's picture

I'm Afraid It's Worse Than First Feared

I'm with you, Jim, on the wright in option. Except that I was thinking of writing in my own name.

Seriously, I cannot bear to listen to Obama or McCain or anyone who claims to speak for them. Their focus is irrelevant.

The issues that challenge us are not about who is offended and who is offensive. We learned on the goddammed playground that their are nice kids and rotten kids. There is no evidence that the nature of children who have lived for a quarter century of more are any different. To insist that some candidate is superior is moot when the focus of the campaigns are trite, misdirected and calculated to appeal not to intellect and civic commitment but to raw, bitten-to-the-quick emotion.

This shit makes me seriously weary. So maybe I shall, unabashed and in the full flower of my citizenship, vote for my own sorry ass.

Where have all the patriots gone? Even so, E Pluribus Unum.

Crudely Wrott's picture

The Oops Factor

. . . and also pay attention to spelling. ;-]

Speaking of the Oops Factor, is it not to be expected that those who seek positions of power would seek to appeal to We the People in the broadest possible manner? And is it not to be expected that they would research the kinds of things that stir people's emotions? And is it not to be observed that people seem to be ruled, or are frequently observed to be ruled, not by thinking something through and arriving at a decision based upon dispassionate consideration? That they rather wing it, with the occasional prayer, hoping that some numinous sense of "A Greater Truth" (TM), no matter how uncertain, has the greatest potential for ensuring "Good Things" (TM) for everyone who takes the dive.

My own observations and experience indicate that most people rarely vote for reasonable reasons, just as they favor actors and entertainers and spouting talking heads without apparent criticism.

"If it feels good, take it as true and make lots of noise about it." There. That is the state of Popular Politics, circa 2000 and a handful. I, for one, am ashamed.

betmo's picture

you know there's a green party candidate right?

Cat Faber's picture

For my part, I have no

For my part, I have no problem with McCain's war record, or whatever; I have a problem with how he treats women. He never met an abortion restriction he didn't vote for. Since I have no desire to be enslaved to produce unwanted babies, that makes my choice an easy one.

Of course, it helps that Obama is a scholar of Constitutional Law and a sensible person with good judgment, who can bring two sides of a touchy issue together in an inspiring synthesis.

And it helps that McCain has nothing to offer on the economy except the same "tax cut" snake oil that has been generously applied and vigorously rubbed in for the last eight years, and done nothing.

But really, in my opinion, that's just gravy.

Anonymous User's picture

Keep it simple - - vote your pocketbook

If you're rich (i.e. own more than seven houses, and income above $5M), vote McCain because he will keep you in clover.

Otherwise, Obama.

As far as religious crap is concerned, they're both annoying, so that fails to be a deciding factor.

lionheart's picture

Wow, interesting opinions

Wow, interesting opinions here.

knotmyline's picture

McCain is not a hero

At best he is a survivor. His survivor stories can be an education. His hero stories are bullshit. Hero prisoners escape, hero prisoners confuse and bewilder their guards not make small talk with them, hero prisoners kill the enemy, etc. He did none of that. All he did was survive and allow that to be called heroism.

wantobe's picture

I agree, good points, but...

I don't know enough about McCain's stay in the lovely Hanoi Hilton; is it a verifiable fact that he did not attempt to escape (the only thing I would change about your above is "Hero prisoners *attempt* to escape")? You say he made small talk with them; could it be that the small talk was an attempt to confuse and bewilder his guards? Did he not kill any enemies?

The one thing I've heard about McCain's POW experience that I would be inclined to call heroic (even if I wouldn't go so far as to call him a hero) is that he had the opportunity to be released early (so his captors assured him) if he would sign documents stating that he was a spy, he had been well treated, or whatever the nature of those things were. I don't know if this is true or not, though, as I have not seen verification of it.

But I agree that simply being a POW doesn't make someone a hero, just like dying in the World Trade Centers doesn't make someone a hero.

Rob Miles
--
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.

Brent Rasmussen's picture

Excellent Point

Good point.

C. Michael Cooper's picture

A Bona-fide war hero?

McCain got shot down 5 times and then got captured. Why does that make him a war hero? I think it makes him a crappy pilot. That is, of course, my opinion, but I think we all need to re-evaluate what it means to be a war hero. Simply serving in combat should not make a war hero, and certainly does not qualify anybody for politics. I fear the day when politicians not only use words as weapons, but use guns, bombs and artillery. Additionally, someone who has been through the horrors of war should be all the more reluctant to put anybody else through the experience.

I think this election is about the economy. We have to rebuild the middle-class before it disappears entirely. Clearly Republicans have no regard for anyone who isn't rich, and that goes for the poor conservative christians that vote for them.

Brent Rasmussen's picture

Again, Good Point

Thanks for replying to my post. You guys have given me a lot to think about.

BrainArmor's picture

Default hereos

I agree with the criticism of the term hero. Here in San Clemente we are just North of Camp Pendleton marine base. Here in town there were some light post banners put up by the city, each with the name of a Pendleton marine who had died. Not to take anything away from their service, but just because they died on the job doesn't make them a hero.

Todd's picture

This election is the final straw

I am no longer a Democrat. I know when I am not welcome. I'm still voting for Obama, though. The alternative is too horrifying to even envision.

Kentucky Boy's picture

Don't overreact

The GOP has had a lot of success painting the Democrats as anti-religion. So the Democrats may be going a little overboard on the pro-God rhetoric to try and reassure christians who are sickened by the corruption at the heart of the GOP that they won't go to Hell for voting democratic. That doesn't change the fact that between the two parties its only the Democrats who respect the 1st Amendment. Remember, we are a tiny minority-you can't win elections without the votes of theists.

Jeffrey Hebert's picture

It's about the war(s)

As far as experience goes, I don't know if there's any such thing as someone with "enough" experience to be President. It's a unique job. I'd say Obama has as much relevant experience as most other political figures, certainly more than Bush had as the no-power Texas Governor. Not that that's saying all that much.

The major problem with voting for McCain (well, one of the major problems) from a general perspective is that his solution to every international crisis -- and they're all crises to John McCain -- is to bomb someone. Anyone. Every incident is the Most Important Existential Crisis For Our Great Country EVAR!! I'm very uncomfortable with someone like that in charge; if it were up to him we'd have invaded Iran and Jordan already, and would be actively at war with Russia over Georgia. Lovely.

From my atheist perspective, at least as a Constitutional scholar Obama understands the importance of the separation of church and state. McCain, meanwhile, represents the party that has done more harm to that concept than anything I can recall in the last fifty years, pandering (with money, laws, and words) to the religious right with everything they have. I don't want another President beholden to those guys for his job.

Your mileage may vary, of course, but if the last eight years hasn't convinced you that the Republicans need to be handed the harshest of rebukes at the ballot box, I don't think anything will. Obama might be a very religious person, and he's not as old -- sorry, experienced -- as McCain, but he's shown good judgment, a sober and calm approach to governing, and a respect for the Constitution that is wholly lacking in the Republican Party. This election matters.

Faceless_Fiend's picture

Pretty much what I was

Pretty much what I was thinking, though expressed better than I could have. When people talk about Obama being inexperienced, they rarely specify what experience they're referring to. At this point someone who is less entrenched and capable of bringing new ideas to the table looks like the better bet.

Vote Cthulhu: Why settle for the lesser of two evils?

Jim Downey's picture

A friend . . .

. . . sent me this last night.

Jim Downey

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like Science Fiction? Read *or listen to* my novel, Communion of Dreams, for free.

Claybow's picture

Great!

That makes me laugh. I gotta get me one of those.

Any twelve people who can't get themselves out of jury duty are not my peers.
______________________
Claybow

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Syndicate content